Przed Pythonie 2.3, wykorzystanie dict():
>>> lst = [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 5, 2]
>>> stats = {}
>>> for x in lst : # count occurrences of each letter:
... stats[x] = stats.get(x, 0) + 1
>>> print stats
{1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 1, 5: 2, 6: 1, 7: 1} # filter letters appearing more than once:
>>> duplicates = [dup for (dup, i) in stats.items() if i > 1]
>>> print duplicates
Więc funkcja:
def getDuplicates(iterable):
"""
Take an iterable and return a generator yielding its duplicate items.
Items must be hashable.
e.g :
>>> sorted(list(getDuplicates([1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 5, 2])))
[2, 5]
"""
stats = {}
for x in iterable :
stats[x] = stats.get(x, 0) + 1
return (dup for (dup, i) in stats.items() if i > 1)
z Pythonem 2.3 pochodzi set(), i to nawet wbudowany po niż:
def getDuplicates(iterable):
"""
Take an iterable and return a generator yielding its duplicate items.
Items must be hashable.
e.g :
>>> sorted(list(getDuplicates([1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 5, 2])))
[2, 5]
"""
try: # try using built-in set
found = set()
except NameError: # fallback on the sets module
from sets import Set
found = Set()
for x in iterable:
if x in found : # set is a collection that can't contain duplicate
yield x
found.add(x) # duplicate won't be added anyway
z Pythonem 2.7 i wyżej, masz providi collections
modułu ng tę samą funkcję niż dict jeden, i możemy zrobić to krótszy (i szybciej, to prawdopodobnie pod maską C) niż w roztworze 1:
import collections
def getDuplicates(iterable):
"""
Take an iterable and return a generator yielding its duplicate items.
Items must be hashable.
e.g :
>>> sorted(list(getDuplicates([1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 5, 2])))
[2, 5]
"""
return (dup for (dup, i) in collections.counter(iterable).items() if i > 1)
będę trzymać roztworem 2.
Dlaczego downvote? –